Stakeholder map
Which roles need to be heard and what each one can and cannot reliably establish.
ProperBizFix Discovery Framework
Give your team better questions than “what do you need the system to do?”
A structured stakeholder discovery framework for implementation teams that want to understand the business logic behind requested features and workflows.
The problem
A script is not enough.
A list of stakeholder questions is useful until the answer creates a new question. Good discovery needs rules for what to pursue, what to treat as evidence, where to look for contradictions and when to stop turning uncertainty into requirements.
The framework is designed as an interview and analysis structure rather than a static questionnaire.
Framework components
From stakeholder coverage to handoff.
Interview guides
Separate guides for leadership, sales, delivery, operations, finance, account management and system ownership.
Follow-up logic
Prompts that move from stated requirement to event, consequence, decision, evidence and exception.
Evidence rules
Distinguish established facts, stakeholder belief, inference, contradiction and unresolved assumption.
Exception capture
Surface non-standard promises, workarounds and edge cases before they become late-stage scope.
Output structure
A consistent format for handing business logic and requirements boundaries to architects and delivery teams.
A typical line of questioning
Do not stop at the requested workflow.
“We need an approval”→What triggers it?→What risk changes?→Who can decide?→What about exceptions?
How it can be used
Framework only, or with an analysis layer.
If your team already has strong client-facing capability, the framework can stay entirely internal. If the bottleneck is turning interviews into coherent business logic, I can analyse the resulting material without joining the client conversations.
Licensing and team use are scoped according to the size of the implementation practice and how the framework will be deployed.